Stoicism and Neo-Platonism · 4284 dagen geleden by Ad van den Ende
Summary of volume I, § 50 to §58 of The Mechanization of the World Picture, written by E.J.Dijkstehuis
Stoicism
50 Stoicism is a philosophical current with various ramifications, extending over several centuries (the sο-called Old Stοa was fοunded about 300 Β.C. by Zeno οf Citium; the Middle Stοa, with which the names of Panaetius and Pοsidοnius are associated, began about 150 Β.C. and lasted until about A.D. 100, and this was followed until about A.D. 200 by Neo-Stoicism). This school was primarily interested not in natural philοsοphy but in ethics.
53. .(…) the fundamental idea of the Stoics remains that the whole universe is an ordered cosmos, which is governed by a pτinciple of rationality and law. Nothing is left, as with the Atomists, to the blind chance which governs the motions of the atoms. The World-Soul as Logos knows all future events, as Providence knows beforehand at what moment they will take place, and as Destiny causes. them to occur at the predetermined moment. But man’s soul essentially participates in this World-Soul, his soul is that part of the World-Soul that permeates his body. This involves ethical consequences of fundamental importance (…).
Neo-Platonism
54
For a good underderstanding οf the history οf the development οf science in later periods some knowledge οf the different trends οf Greek philosophy is indespendabile even when the system under consideration is pervaded by a spirit that is indifferent οr even hostile tο the study οf nature. As it is, Greek thought has largely marked and defined the intellectual arena in which all later differences οf opinion οn the character and the value οf science heave been fought. It is therefore essential for the purpose οf this book that some reference should be made tο the last philosophical system whch declining ancient civilίzatiοn produced and in which the whole wealth of Greek thought was once more revealed.
58.
There are two reasons why this discussion is not as irrelevant as it may seem. In the first place the history of science should pay attention not only to the factors that have promoted scientific thinking, but also to those which have obstructed it; in the second place there is the special circumstance which gives European importance tο Νeο-Platonism, namely that Greek thought was handed down tο later generations for several centuries entirely via Neo-Platonism, so that even the older phases οf ancient philosophy at first did not penetrate into the West in their true form, but in a Νeo-Platonic garb. A treatise by Prοclus, the last important representative οf the system, is among the writings that have exercised a strong influence in this respect. It was cοmpίled entirely οn the model of the fundamental mathematical work the Elements οf Euclid, from which it also took its title (Elementatiο theοlοgica), and its 211 propositions dealt with the whole of Neo-Platonic philosophy and theology. It became known to the Arabs, and through them to Western Europe, by the title Libre de Causis. The best illustration οf the extent tο which Neo-Platonism was the medium through which all Greek philosophy was seen is the fact that this book was generally taken for a work by Aristotle, to whom was also attributed another work οf a similar character, the Theοlοgia Aristοtelis. Thomas Aquinas was the first tο recognize the impossibility οf this.
